<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ballad of Google and Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/</link>
	<description>Blogging on all things Tech, SEO, link management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:06:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Android or iPhone? Wrong Question « abovethecrowd.com &#171; The Apple Blog (WPAutomate Demo)</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-19531</link>
		<dc:creator>Android or iPhone? Wrong Question « abovethecrowd.com &#171; The Apple Blog (WPAutomate Demo)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-19531</guid>
		<description>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position “iPhone vs. Android” as the title fight of the decade in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position “iPhone vs. Android” as the title fight of the decade in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Android or iPhone? Wrong Question</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-19516</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Android or iPhone? Wrong Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-19516</guid>
		<description>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position &#8220;iPhone vs. Android&#8221; as the title fight of the decade in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position &ldquo;iPhone vs. Android&rdquo; as the title fight of the decade in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android or iPhone? Wrong Question &#171; abovethecrowd.com</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-19501</link>
		<dc:creator>Android or iPhone? Wrong Question &#171; abovethecrowd.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-19501</guid>
		<description>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position “iPhone vs. Android” as the title fight of the decade in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] analysts and bloggers have worked hard to position “iPhone vs. Android” as the title fight of the decade in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry R</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-15759</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-15759</guid>
		<description>I wish Google or Magicjack would give an estimated date for Number Portability.  I want to invest in an Ooma but don&#039;t want to pay $40 to port my number to it when I really want my number to run through Google Voice with all its features.  Wife wants to keep home number so we pay premium to verizon to keep the traditional landline.  I know my luck.  Port number for $40 on 12/1 and then Google voice allows it on 12/15.  At least if Magicjack allowed porting,  I could port it and forward it to Google Voice and get all of google voices features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Google or Magicjack would give an estimated date for Number Portability.  I want to invest in an Ooma but don&#8217;t want to pay $40 to port my number to it when I really want my number to run through Google Voice with all its features.  Wife wants to keep home number so we pay premium to verizon to keep the traditional landline.  I know my luck.  Port number for $40 on 12/1 and then Google voice allows it on 12/15.  At least if Magicjack allowed porting,  I could port it and forward it to Google Voice and get all of google voices features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-15741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-15741</guid>
		<description>Hey Avi, good point. I&#039;ve updated that part. Thanks for the heads up, and thanks for commenting.

Chase</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Avi, good point. I&#8217;ve updated that part. Thanks for the heads up, and thanks for commenting.</p>
<p>Chase</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi Tar</title>
		<link>http://wholinkstome.com/blog/the-ballad-of-google-and-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-15740</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi Tar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wholinkstome.com/blog/?p=1366#comment-15740</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where you get the idea that Google has Number Portability. Either you know something the rest of us don&#039;t, or you don&#039;t understand what Number Portability means. This feature, sadly, is not available. Many of us would have been all over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where you get the idea that Google has Number Portability. Either you know something the rest of us don&#8217;t, or you don&#8217;t understand what Number Portability means. This feature, sadly, is not available. Many of us would have been all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
